beta opulence: revaal month fpaas phfaas mono

beta opulence is just a huge pero O'D whereas everything is right key iterated as a depedant qual where the notion to move passed ameri is opulent hive pfaas mono fpaas opulence finland homer strider inga!

devolved beans as results in operator walling result beans (in example blowfish uses plaintext iterations over the key in notions left key half, right key half in a 16 round loop)

in my example in the stream cipher eil,
there is a finite way to expose the value of a walled bean as a result after the key separation happens whereas, the plaintext crosses the key value and creates a result.
 the notion in eil whereas the notion that sympaths are possible, there is simply one small amount in redundency as much the cipher creates values after key mixing operation over the plaintext.

in one notion formal as an weight in example here is how a totient operator is exposed:
01010 01010
^-- if we take two bits from each half we can notice a formal notion that we can sample the bits with the notion to repose them
whereas all the bits are not likely q operator bean mixed they are supposed to respose value over reposeing them in sympaths

10 <-- aa possible bein
00 <-- ev possible bein ev__e
a __e __ev __a whereas 0 1 is aa 00 ev __aa 01 ev aa
if must be made clear that no operations are supposed in aa but ev is bein operation. this is the notion to make formal that mathematically to suppose the ev bein operation is simply only the result of novalue beta we reposeing the bits in aa are necessarily ev bein, the bits are ev ev or aa repose aa bit thqoursuse dimension aa where the regardance of ev is supposed there are no operations whereas aa is simple a repose of bits over accumulating them.

this is the great hurd that bean mixed ev values are supposed to have the notion that aa value accumlations are totarae bein ev oust kerlen b align a, whereas isqv is ev bein possible repose sympath aa eovoluance whereas voluance is supposed aa voluant ev

operator wall eergen bean mix: observation

typedef union {
    u8 a:1;
    u8 b:1;
    u8 c:1;
    u8 d:1;
    u8 e:1;
    u8 f:1;
    u8 g:1;
    u8 h:1;
    Lu sp;
} Vn;

^-- this bean is NOT really the engagement in my opinion of a term where there is operator wall possibles in the press of creating a cipher. the wall totient value of the bean and the totient of the operator value result doesnt DO anything....

there must be somthing at play here with bit operations that simply remain eil no wall whereas the term is bean eyan nu and the notion to hive.... the notion to split the bean into results with operators in ciphers is not portentious, its remains to me mysterious, this notion then is that mystery isnt going to be the result of another just the same thing without the i but the notion that q, or operations are then notion that operation on beans with operators cannot cross the bean totient without valid assumptions....

#include <memory.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>

#define u32 unsigned long
#define u8 unsigned char

typedef enum {
        la=1,
        aa
} la_t, La;

struct ter_a_ {
        struct ter_a_ *ad; /* tera_ --> x */
        struct ter_a_ *ev; /* x <-- tera_ */
        void *ra;
};
typedef struct ter_a_ Tera;

typedef struct {
        La li;
        Tera *l;
        Tera *i;
        unsigned long amn; /* ter_a's */
struct {
        void *lus;
        void *(*nic)(void *, void *);        /* <- lus, -> lus, -> ra */
} va;
} lu_t, *Lu;

typedef union {
    u8 a:1;
    u8 b:1;
    u8 c:1;
    u8 d:1;
    u8 e:1;
    u8 f:1;
    u8 g:1;
    u8 h:1;
    Lu sp;
} Vn;

Lu Lu_la ( La );
Lu Lu_ca ( Lu, unsigned long amn );
void VA_Push(Vn* vnoid, void* lus);
Lu Lu_da ( Lu* );


#define \
VA_STATE(vn_, lus_, nic_) \
        do { \
                ((vn_)->sp.va.lus = (void *) lus_; \
                ((vn_)->sp.va.nic = nic_; \
        } while(0); \


#define PHASAR 0 /* q0, eq1; whereby we limit to SQUARE */
#define SQUARE 1 /* q1, eq0; whereby we limit to PHASAR */
#define ZINCID 2 /* qe, ec0; whereby we limit to ec1 */
#define RREHTM 3 /* -(o) qr, ec1; whereby we limit to ec2 */
#define ZDIFFN 4 /* re, lm2; lohit, baekmuk, cudjkuni; whereby we limit cosine dysfunction na square -.*/
#define XSINED 5 /* qn, r3d; lohit, baekmuk, cudjkuni; whereby we limit sine reduction between quad non-verbal square verbal */
#define EDESTR 6 /* eqe, nh-1; e tangent destruction in limit tandem with quad non-verbal and square verbal respectively */

extern u32 g1;
extern u32 g0;
extern u32 n0;
extern u32 he;
extern u32 n; /* SQUARE retention in tandem with PHASAR 6 non verbal(tb) e tangent limit square verbal(ta); whereby RREHTM is presupposed */
typedef struct {
                u8 quad_tandm; /* 6 phases na square */
                u32 limit_quad;
                u8 square_tandm; /* 6 phases na quad */
                u32 limit_square;
                u8 zincid_tandm; /* incidence of na; (tb) nhe (ta); limit of pure — +(o) — e tangent destruction */
                u32 limit_zincid;
} pt_t; /* positronium */
typedef struct { /* square randem RREHTM na h of -(o); ( (a of -(h)) — n + (R — e) ) */
                u32 (*go-nhe)(void* qr, void* qo, void* qe); /* verbal square na quad na tandem go-nhe; e tangent destruction na (o) cosine dysfunction */
                u32 (*nhe-go)(void *re, void *qone, void* eqe); /* relative movement of verbal limit where -(0) is mundane seeking through negative quad */
                u32 (*nhe-h)(void* qn, void* lmtwo);
} ps_t;

u32 (*zero_sympath)(void* qr, void* qo, void* qe) { }
u32 (*one_sympath)(void* re, void* qone, void* eqe) {}
u32 (*three_uma_bean_byte)(void* qn, void* lmtwo) {}

observation static amit: new arc and the vagabond 10e ere ere gen eergena (eer'eer'geena)